Maine Marketing
This blog is written by several prominent members of the Maine Marketing Association, a nonprofit organization that provides ongoing marketing-related education.

Dane SomersDane Somers is a Marketing Consultant specializing in Strategic Marketing for Value Creation, a member of the Adjunct Faculty at the USM School of Business, and serves on the Board of the Maine Marketing Association as Program Chair.

Blog Index
February 07, 2007
Super Bowl Ad drops the ball.

A Return on Investment for Marketing (Marketing ROI) is a touchy subject for many business managers and owners. Can a Marketing ROI be negative?

We have probably all heard the old adage - "Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is, I don’t know which half." This is attributed to retail magnate John Wanamaker in the late 1800’s, over a century ago. Things haven’t changed much.

Even successful Fortune 500 firms are subject to spending money foolishly…lots of it. The average cost of a Super Bowl Ad this year: $2.5 million for a 30 second spot. That’s more than I make in a whole year! ;-)

Winners?? Hard to say. The Biggest Loser? One of the top contenders for that dubious spot has to be Masterfoods who owns Mars candies and the Snickers brand.

This from Online Media Daily


"According to a Masterfoods spokeswoman, humor was all the (Snickers) ads were trying to achieve.

"We know that humor is highly subjective and understand that some people may have found the ad offensive. Clearly that was not our intent," the spokeswoman said in a statement.

"Consequently, we do not plan to continue to air the ad on television or on our Snickers website."

"Omnicom Group's TBWAChiatDay in New York, which designed the ad, could not be reached by press time."

You spend $2.5 Million dollars to achieve humor????? And, it’s so bad that it demeans your company and its valuable brand image? That’s not funny. This is, in my opinion, irresponsible. Shame, shame on you Masterfoods and also ChiatDay – the Ad Agency that put this together.

This type of advertising makes marketers look like a bunch of drunken fools…oh, wait a minute…that was the Go Daddy! Ad, wasn’t it?

Don’t you think Marketing investments should have a clearly defined and measurable return?

Posted by Dane Somers at 02:08 PM

E-mail this entry to a friend

Comments

I am certain that measurable return on advertising is what we all want. But in hte last 20 years I have seen few if any ads, methods or plans that measured much more than how much was spent. In fact I just got off of teh phone with a web portal salesman who offers as his standard three to five e-mails a day. Pretty low for someone who already gets a hundred or so. The only lower standard is the number of impressions that otehr media offer. What is the meaning of how many copies of your magazine you printed? And who cares?

Posted by Don Kleiner
February 8, 2007 06:27 PM

At first I thought the ad was disgusting homo-eroticism, then I realized that this disgust, felt by the millions whop watched it, really ticked-off the homosexual crowd who believe that we should NOT feel disgust for the realities of their sexual proclivities.

The ad then predictably reflects the majority of Americans disgust with the homo-eroticism and proceeds with humorous mach-man red-neckery.

Obviously, there is much work for the gay crowd to do in convincing Americans that their sexual proclivities are as normal as any perversion that some Americans enjoy on a regular basis.

Posted by Dick
February 12, 2007 07:52 AM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?







Please enter the code as seen in the image above:



Blog Index
Updates
Sign up to be notified when there's a new entry
RSS
Subscribe